- BITDEFENDER ANTIVIRUS FREE EDITION VS WINDOWS DEFENDER FULL
- BITDEFENDER ANTIVIRUS FREE EDITION VS WINDOWS DEFENDER SOFTWARE
SE Labs attempts to simulate the real world of malware as closely as possible for testing purposes, using a capture/replay system to present each product with a real-world Web-based attack. Only ESET and Norton managed Level 1 certification in the latest test. It reached Level 2 certification in the broad-spectrum test, along with F-Secure and Microsoft Windows Defender Security Center. Bitdefender passed the banking test, along with ESET, Kaspersky, Norton, and a few others. If some malware gets through, but is eliminated within 24 hours, that earns Level 2. If a product absolutely blocks every installation attempt, it passes at Level 1. Another test using a wide variety of malware offers two passing levels. To pass this lab's banking Trojans test, a product needs a perfect score anything less is failure.
The tests performed by MRG-Effitas are a bit different from the rest. Avast, AVG, McAfee, and Kaspersky came close, with two Advanced+ certifications and one Advanced.
Bitdefender is the only product that took Advanced+ in the latest instances of all three tests. Products that pass a test earn Standard certification, while those that go significantly beyond the minimum to pass receive Advanced or even Advanced+ certification. The researchers at AV-Comparatives perform a wide variety of tests I follow three of them. Avast Free Antivirus, Kaspersky, Microsoft, and Norton were among the products that managed a perfect score in the latest test. Bitdefender missed a perfect 18 points due to a few false positives that cost it a half-point in usability, but 17.5 points is sufficient for the lab to name it a Top Product. In the three-part test regularly reported by AV-Test Institute, antivirus programs can earn up to six points each for effective protection, low impact on performance, and few usability problems (meaning false positives). Three of the four labs that I follow include Bitdefender in their testing. Still, it’s worth looking at the excellent scores the commercial edition earned. The labs do make it clear that their results are only validated for the actual product under testing. While Bitdefender Free doesn't include every feature of the commercial edition, its core antivirus engine is the same as what the independent labs test, Bitdefender Antivirus Plus. Kaspersky Security Cloud Free also performed impressive optimization in its latest test, going from 70 minutes for the initial scan down to 4.5 minutes for a repeat scan. That scan clearly performed some optimization, as a repeat scan finished barely over a minute.
BITDEFENDER ANTIVIRUS FREE EDITION VS WINDOWS DEFENDER FULL
A full scan took 58 minutes, quicker than the current average of 64 minutes. When you launch a scan, the scan's progress simply appears in the events timeline, unless you click it to see the full scan window. That's the whole interface.Īs always, you should run a full scan right after installation, to root out any malware that infested the system before you installed antivirus. There's a button to run the full system scan, a drag/drop spot to scan specific files or folders, and a timeline of recent activity. The premium edition's main window isn't especially busy, but the free edition is simplicity itself. Many free antivirus products look just like their commercial equivalents, but with some features grayed out or visibly locked. You need to sign up for a Bitdefender account to activate the product (or sign in if you already have one). During the setup process, it downloads the latest version and scans for active malware. Getting Bitdefender Free running on your system is quick and easy.
BITDEFENDER ANTIVIRUS FREE EDITION VS WINDOWS DEFENDER SOFTWARE
0 kommentar(er)
